>>1238652 they repeat, we have to repeat.

sorry.

They're trying to "pizzagate" the NXIVM story, same gameplay all over again.

bad mixed with good.

Definitely on-target (not this article, but NXIVM digs).

The play is obvious:

NXIVM

real story + various unfounded claims + discredited source = the "pizzagate" effect…

Poisoning the well, trying to derail from what's solid to what's wilder and more easily spinned.

Once a source is established as not credible it has a whole other use, it can be used to hide and tarnish embarassing truths, as well.

>1 & 1 don’t equal 2.

>EYES OPEN?

when something is true

lies told about it

does not make it

any less true

but it can make them

appear not to be

>>1238676

not a bad effort, but you seem to be missing the last post by anon, endorsed by Q.

there's room for the Patriots, in there

>>1238733

>Not sure if this has surfaced on the boards yet

last 2 breads, multiple times.

all over this one.

try harder

>>1238767 >>1238740

yup, other woke anons see it too.

currently the tactic seems to be endless repetition of real and/or fake newfaggery, just like the waves of

"guys what's up with qanon.posts?"

we had recently.

Expect the YNW link to be posted, anons reply pointing out the disinfo, then reposted, then anons point out disinfo, etc, etc.

and they partly use defense of the fact that YNW is "just linking to another story": ok then, use that one, they don't.

>>1238843

gotta put some butter on that slice…

dry wiki link and "LABELED"?

>>1238960 >>1238987

>rouge

it's rogue.

rouge

is

red

(sorry but it`s for your own credibility, it really looks bad for what you mean to say)

>>1239050

no need to live in a mom's-basement-caricature to be able to scan the bread you're in + notables to check before you post.

basic operating procedure.

you reposting crap without looking just adds clutters, and as you know,

Some of us have kids and lives.

>>1239158

> rouge is rogue.

good point.

damn, now it's never going away…

>>1239225

same here, that's been sticking with me…

>>1239187 >>1239252

most anons agree that actual diggings on NXIVM are notableworty, they are just weary of pointlessly using a discredited site for no reason (particularly if linked article just links to another)

>>1239296

you took up less space yesterday, paced yourself better, worked better.

now it's going overboard and poorly spaced again.

sad.

you are the one blocking your message from reaching, anon. work on it.

>>1239350

part of the fun…

everyone given a fresh new chance