Q#4881
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 10/17/2020 12:36:26
https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'.3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q
>jidf
>jidf
>jidf
>jidf
>Attacks nameless 'jews' all day
>kvetches when called out on Marxist collectivist guilt by association fallacy
>projects false accusation that Anons are defending jews instead of demolishing the muhjoo's idiocy.
About sum it up, muhjoo?
>but are not jews
There is nothing to refute, muhjoo.
You never post any direct source of evidence.
Accusations are not proof.
Accusations do not 'require' 'disproof' or else they're true.
You're not the judge of the replies to your own accusations you stupid Marxist.
Gay AF.