>>12397848 (PB)

>So the point you're not making is - Is it a deep fake or not a deep fake?

I don't know if it's a deep fake. I know that the EVIDENCE that it was a deep fake IS fake.

Someone is creating a false narrative that the video is a deep fake.

I'm working on another video which might help explain it better.

>>12398055

>Someone is creating a false narrative that the video is a deep fake.

I made a new video to emphasize my point.

Notice how the face on both frames is the same, but the timestamps are different!?

MIND BLOWN. GET THIS ON TWITTER!