>>12398595 (pb)

>I'm not sure all anons are grasping something, so I'll say it:

>LEGISLATIVE AND JUDICIAL AVENUES HAVE FAILED

>Unless there is some remaining SCOTUS decision I'm not aware of. After failing in Congress and failing in the Supreme Court all we have left is:

>EXECUTIVE branch (POTUS)

>who also happens to control the military.

>So the chain of events for seating POTUS on January 20 are down to just a few options:

>1. Military emergency that allows him to arrest everyone and try them in a military court

>2. Massive Declass that makes constituents from both sides drag their representatives out into the streets, ending in a constitutional crisis that would involve the seating of new representatives and a do-over on the vote certification.

>3. Using his popular support to declare a new government, i.e. a modern Revolution. Seems risky, even though hell yeah I would go along with that.

1 and 3 would result in a civil war where our children (18 - 20 year old boys) would be the primary causality of war. How many of our kids would have to die? 100k died in the 'Civil' war. 50% of our population are completely brainwashed and think Trump is a cult leader determined to stay in power at all costs. These people would enthusiastically support preventing him from doing so and would think it was their patriotic duty (just as we think it is our patriotic duty to support him).

2 may certainly be possible. But it makes me wonder why in the hell this information wasn't already released. What is the benefit to withholding it until now? Waking people up? Please. Take a look at the response to Tuesday. Moderates and liberals think Trump incited a coup. That's hardly waking people up.

I would think if they truly "ha[d] it all," they would have already release it all. Was "we have it all" just Sun Tzu's "Act strong when you are weak?"

I'm intellectually honest enough to admit I don't know. Maybe Q, Trump, even Lin Wood, do in fact have it all. I have no other choice but to wait and see.