Anons, I’ve paused the exact moment the firearm was discharged.

The gun was at a straight 90 degree angle when fired.

The supposed victim was elevated approximately 3ft of the ground when shot.

Given the range, the angle of the gun when fired, and the position of the supposed victim when shot and the wound inflicted, how is it even possible?

By my estimation his gun would of had to of been at a 30 degree angle when discharged.

Any forensic/geometry fags wanna chime in?

I am but a plane phonefag and it’s ringing alarm bells with me.

>>12400507

I allowed for that variant, examine the video carefully in full and you will see she was 3ft off the floor the exact moment she was allegedly shot.

Geometry doesn’t lie. Even my weak arse attempt at a ballistics analysis would hold up in court.

Look at the pictures I posted, his bullet would of hit her in the midsection at highest.

>>12400663

Knobody got shot in the face if you actually examine my post.

Balastics 101

>>12400688

The ballistics analysis prove that isn’t possible. Even for the most simple minded.

>>12400760

Just stick to the ballistics. That shot is not possible.

>>12400805

Just examine my original post. Accompanied by the full video It would hold up in court. Well an honest court if you could find one.

I don’t know why so many supposed autists are having trouble understanding why shooting somebody in the neck elevated 3 to 4 ft of the floor at close range with the gun held at 90 degrees isn’t possible