dChan
Anonymous ID: 5b6705 Jan. 8, 2021, 2:30 p.m. No.12407542   🗄️.is đź”—kun

Flynn

 

I’m not sure if this picture will pop up. But thank you @alx for letting me & all my 1.2M twitter teammates know that I’ve been suspended. God Bless our right to free speech and God Bless America!

 

file:///var/mobile/Library/SMS/Attachments/11/01/1FBB460F-32CA-408A-9789-57E34C478B25/IMG_9114.png

 

https://parler.com/post/555d3db69bd04860a94d1c603f496c2a

 

>9114

>mirror

>4119

Anonymous ID: 5b6705 Jan. 8, 2021, 2:40 p.m. No.12407782   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>7856

New filing in USA v. Maxwell: Letter Motion

 

We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell,

 

to respectfully request a 30-day extension of time under Rule 4(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure to file our notice of appeal of the Court’s order denying Ms. Maxwell’s renewed motion for bail

 

(Dkt. 104, 106).

Rule 4(b)(4) provides that a district court may, upon a finding of “good cause,” extend the

time to file a notice of appeal “for a period not to exceed 30 days.” Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4). In

criminal cases, a defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed “within 14 days after … the entry of

either the judgment or the order being appealed.” Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i). The Court’s

order denying Ms. Maxwell’s renewed motion for bail was entered on December 28, 2020. (Dkt.

104, 106). Accordingly, Ms. Maxwell’s notice of appeal of that order must be filed on or before

Monday, January 11, 2021.

There is good cause for an extension here. Ms. Maxwell is considering whether to submit

a third bail application to the Court, which would propose even more stringent and restrictive bail

conditions than those proposed in the renewed bail application. The requested extension will give

Ms. Maxwell the opportunity to research whether and to what extent these additional conditions

are legally and practicably available, without forfeiting as untimely a possible appeal from the

Court’s December 28 Order denying the renewed bail application. The additional time is also

warranted because it will enable the defense to continue its review of recently produced

documents and to file our pretrial motions (each of which may bear on the merits of a possible

third bail application); to research whether an appeal of the December 28 Order might deprive this

Court of jurisdiction to address a third bail application; and because of logistical challenges posed

by the continued effects of the pandemic.

 

https://eu.usatoday.com/documents/7341440-Letter-Motion/