Yup, don't allow yourself to be screwed over by them slipping in an intermediary whose sole purpose is to mess up the info
>>1240965 i think it's ok by now, i copypastaed that a few times already, as a reply to the constant re-posting of "naive" ''hey guys just saw this watcha think" posts
No problem, you seem to understand the issue and show restraint. The worst part about occasional long posts is only the replies complaining about them, not so much the posts themselves (except obvious trolls and screaming red texts pelicans and their ilk, of course). The plan is posting the whole psalm book of the bible? How far are you into it?
>Since DNA already identifies the gender of the perpetrator the pool of possible suspects is cut in half right away.
>would someone go through all that trouble (creating a website, making fake emails) for a hoax?
define hoax
>ideas on how to correctly fight the bots?
-Recognize them
-Filter/Ignore.
that's pretty much it. they do annoy me and waste bread, but banning is just overworking BO/BVs who then have to chase after a dozen IPs at least per bread. As far as i know, no magic solution there. Maybe they could at least give some temp bans for specific codewords we know the bots use, but i don't know much how that whole side works.
But this whole "let's fuck hope the numbering system and hope that somehow magically confuses our enemies" is… um… no comment is probably better. But not a good plan.
nah, i was inferring that the very definition of hoax implies going through trouble of making stuff up
>much needed meme cultur
if only this.
nasimbaker gave a much needed kick in the ass to the troops lacking bakery knowledge, and the multitude of specific nasimemes for every occasion never ceases to amaze me.
just because some shill might use it and abuse it (like the Obama portrait, or fkn Hogg, etc), doesn't mean some anons can't have a sense of humor. My vote for Nasimfags as well, just look at the fruits: Nasimpost vs Whiney, Multiple Posts Complaining About Them… who's fucking up breads?
///
I'll admit to not reading them, but you also have my vote as not minding them. I know you get a lot of complaints, but know most just don't comment but many don't oppose - your restraint in posting is good, though.
Wish you all the best, take care - both of you, actually, in different but similar ways
>>1241671 no, it's a remake, and Jimi hated that cover, not his plan