>>12411109 lb/pb is Q from the future?
Imagine a prosecutor at the end of a case. He can't tell you what happened, so he writes down some notes and puts them online. Later on, the case goes to trial and his notes start to make sense. As the case progresses you understand more of the note. It's the future (now) proving the past (writings). Much, but certainly not all of what Q wrote is like this. Explanative as opposed to predictive.
There is legal precedent for the President's Twitter being official communications:
“Twitter is not just an official channel of communication for the President; it is his most important channel of communication,” the judge concluded in a decision with implications for how elected officials throughout the country use social media platforms to communicate with constituents.
(It was another POTUS set up:)
"The decision Monday leaves in place a unanimous three-judge panel ruling from July. The court held that because the president uses his Twitter account to conduct official government business, he cannot exclude voices or viewpoints with which he disagrees."
Courtesy copies of our Program the [Placeholder] are available at your favorite Q Dispensary. Why not join in and follow along? Search for 'Placeholder':
[First Placeholders]
OIG report, DECLAS, other released facts re: 18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES.
Q
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.459 📁
Nov 11 2018 14:40:57 (EST)
[Placeholder - Acts of Treason + support Articles]
[Placeholder - Foreign Acts_pub]