Anonymous ID: 8f3e18 Jan. 8, 2021, 7:50 p.m. No.12416493   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12416466

Q#4881

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 10/17/2020 12:36:26

https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746

There is 'Q'. 1

There are 'Anons'. 2

There is no 'Qanon'.3

Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?

DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?

Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].

You are correct, CJ.

Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]

Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.

Q

Anonymous ID: 8f3e18 Jan. 8, 2021, 8 p.m. No.12416698   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6728 >>6763

>>12416630

So the theory is, post trash talk about Q as a means to spread awareness of Q and avoid banhammer?

 

Sort of like a nudge nudge wink wink sort of thing?

 

Like, hey get a load of this Q bullshit drop that talked about Twitter censoring POTUS. As if it's anyone's fault but Trump!

 

That kind of code talk?

Anonymous ID: 8f3e18 Jan. 8, 2021, 8:13 p.m. No.12416965   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12416801

>https://twitter.com/b_fung/status/1347752954514853889?s=19

 

"There's a difference between someone reporting on the president, and someone attempting to allow their account to be used by the president to essentially get around the ban," a Twitter spokesperson told me.

 

This response is what would expect from a low IQ tollbooth employee being intentionally evasive and stupid to explain their dumb actions.

 

What exactly is the difference?

 

Suppose a journalist posted to their twitter account statements the President told the journalist.

 

The only way Twitter can 'differentiate' between whether that journalist posted it 'to report' or whether they did so 'to get around Twitter ban' would be by arbitrary accusations or arbitrary permissions by Twitter.

 

Does Twitter not understand the logic of information and communication?

 

2+2=4 is true no matter who says it.

 

Twitter has gone full retard.