>>12417596 lb

The thing that sticks out as a RED FLAG

for me regarding this post is this:

"Trump supporters picked them up and gave them to the correct authorities."

Why in the world would that "task" be left

to civilians who broke the law by breaking

into the Capitol?

And under what pretext and authority

can the laptops be confiscated?

If it was a mil-op, then, fine.

Plausible.

Expected.

THEY would handle all of that.

But the "gathering" of relevant "evidence"

WOULD NOT be left to HYPED-UP

supposed Trump supporters roaming

freely in and out of offices and in the

middle of taking selfies, taking other

people's property then running up to

"Trump's people" and saying, "Dude,

here. I did you a favor. You

might need this. Here ya go."

How would they even have been able to

determine WHO TRUMP'S PEOPLE

were?

smh

>>12418299

Looks to me like this is

ALL TALK and NO paperwork.

Which means …

>>12418324

That would fall under a mil-op

which means they weren't

mere Trump supporters and WOULD

NOT have had the need to HAND THEM

to so-called Trump's people.

>>12418308

Am not following the point you're

trying to make here.

I did use my head and that's

why I don't think the post passes the

smell test and posted it here

to open it up for further scrutiny.

>>12418405

quite possibly, no?

hmmm …

>>12418450

dasting indeed.

worthy of the 24-48hr proof test.

let's see what happens.