>Granny went to bed at 8pm like she always does.
Not this granny you delapidated nigger pussy on the savannah of fucktardopolis!
I put dick and morning poop pics in my google/drive for (((Them))) to enjoy.
> I don't suppose you could enlighten us on how to calculate mirrors?
Closed sets form numerical inversions atypical of the world as we understand it, Anon. Modulo Operands form equivalencies between points in space/time where you can pre-assess likely outcomes within a "foreseeable" margin of error.
I'm not the Mothman, though. Just a mathanon who likes math stuff.
Set theory is a branch of mathematical logic that studies sets, which informally are collections of objects. Although any type of object can be collected into a set, set theory is applied most often to objects that are relevant to mathematics. The language of set theory can be used to define nearly all mathematical objects. The modern study of set theory was initiated by Georg Cantor and Richard Dedekind in the 1870s. After the discovery of paradoxes in naive set theory, such as Russell's paradox, numerous axiom systems were proposed in the early twentieth century, of which the Zermelo–Fraenkel axioms, with or without the axiom of choice, are the best-known. Set theory is commonly employed as a foundational system for mathematics, particularly in the form of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of choice. Beyond its foundational role, set theory is a branch of mathematics in its own right, with an active research community
>basis for quantum computer projections
Well, we're talking about a set that spans a 4yr period, so assuming it's a daily set, that would make it 730**730.
I'm not even sure a quantum computer could handle that many probabilities, I have no idea about what they are, what they're supposed to be or if they're just another money laundering meme like NASA, but it's possible with a CPU like they house in Utah, that could be widdled down to manageable sets with a lower likelihood of outcome.
I know Rothschild has held a patent on "Predictive outcome" since the 70s
>Why does Hunter do crack if he can afford cocaine?
Crack and Cocaine are two completely different drugs.
Cocaine lasts all of 5 minutes while crack will put you on your ass for 15-20 minutes and have the train rolling down the tracks on you for a solid 3 minutes.
>You've never smoked crack, or done coke
There isn't a drug on earth I haven't done habitually or made synthetically if possible.
I'm the only ex meth addict I've ever met.
>5 years clean, anon. god bless.
I just passed a year
I thought I was the only one. Took me damn near a year to get any form of life back in me but the cravings were taken away from me from day 1 for whatever reason yet too be realized.
Good to know there's more than one of us.
>Then you know LSD does nothing if you take it more than one day in a row.
If I had it to do over again (I won't be doing drugs again) I'd experiment with micro-dosing.
>I wish I didn't know.
Yeah I turned into a major asshole on LSD once and never did it again. I became a bully and gave some little hippy kids a hard time at the beach. Then I sobered up and felt like a complete cunt so I never wanted to do it again.
>never had it again.
You got lucky
It's hard to tell when it happens, but most everyone I knew used it for beneficial energy purposes until they started using it to wake up and go about their lives.
Eventually you just start mainlining it because the high lasts much longer and you can actually get high vs smoking it which does nothing to you once your hooked. I'd hit the pipe to go to bed at night.