Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 9, 2021, 1:47 a.m. No.12421206   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1242 >>1340

There is speculation that the internet might "go down" via disruption of DNS service, but communication to IP targets might continue to work. And if this is happens, a workaround is entering domain/IP pairs in the hosts file or equivalent.

 

My question relates to SSL certificates for sites using https. To what extent does SSL verification depend upon the local device's ability to communicate with the certificate provider? Are there entries we should be adding to our hosts file for continued SSL support (e.g. special subdomains at the main SSL issuers)?

 

True we can say "ignore" in a browser when it can't verify SSL, but there are various services and contexts where that's not really a viable approach, so I'd like to know if there's a hosts file approach.

 

I realize answers may depend upon the specific SSL credential issuer, but there aren't so many of those, so this might be in reach for at least some of them …

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 9, 2021, 1:54 a.m. No.12421246   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1254

>>12421084

 

Although he was a civilian, he became the Commander in Chief. I would expect representatives from all Military branches to attend what amounts to a Change-of-Command ceremony. Absolutely nothing unusual.

 

Sauce - I attended a bunch of said ceremonies during my 10 yrs on active duty.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 9, 2021, 2:04 a.m. No.12421290   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12421242

 

Thanks for your reply!

 

In case this is helpful to note as a potential roadblock – I ran into a situation perhaps a year ago where SSL didn't work on a PC because it was unable to connect to a specific domain name crl.sca1b.amazontrust.com (this was for a website with an AWS issued certificate) used by AWS to check for certificate revocation. The PC just was unable to connect to that domain name, for whatever reason. Got around it in Windows by telling Windows to not test for SSL revocation. That was a weird case where not being able to connect to a domain name made SSL fail, so putting that domain in the hosts file might be useful. Reading up on that, it seems certificate revocation protocols were a mess …

 

There's a workaround in Windows for that CRL example, but I didn't know if the baseline normal SSL action might also need access to external resources. I appreciate the explanation!

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 9, 2021, 2:09 a.m. No.12421323   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12421100

 

This reminds me of the interview he did for Playboy in 1990. I actually have that issue and I've gone back and re-read that interview several times now - usually to go back and compare something he recently said to something I thought he said in '90. A lot of the interview is standard Trump braggadocio, but scroll down and look at the part where the interviewer asks about him sometimes talking like a presidential candidate.

 

This is a real-life version of future-proves-past. Enjoy.

 

https://vocal.media/filthy/donald-trump-playboy-interview

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 9, 2021, 2:29 a.m. No.12421471   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12421254

 

Sorry anon - I should've been more clear. I meant in 2017 at President Trump's inauguration. The prior anon said they were wondering why all those military peeps were there. That's why they were there for Trump.

 

Now, for Biden… there can be dual meanings.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 9, 2021, 3:17 a.m. No.12421793   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12421745

 

I will be shitposting and digging. Its what I do. Thee is so much moar to be researched once the flood gates open.

The whats next is going to be the best part Freedom . POTUS 2.0 as the director of the next show…Getting Shit Done for the people of the US and WW!