>I don't think Trump can allow Biden to be sworn in if he is a national security threat.
Good point but then again the 2018 election was allowed to be frauded as part of the sting, same with 2020. From what has occurred over the last 4 years, Trump and his team don't seem to be concerned with the repercussions of giving the enemy more power, even if it is for a sting op. But like someone said, that could be because he believes in giving people a second chance on top of it being part of the whole op. I can't say what's going to happen next, but that we all need a formal victory of some sort. While behind the scenes Trump may have everything set in place, in the eyes of the public, Trump's team has not scored a goal and we're 3/4 of the way through the game. I understand that is the strategy here, and he has to go in for a clean kill, but optically speaking we really do need a goal at some point to shake the normies up a little bit. MSM still reigns supreme to the eyes of the public.