Anonymous ID: 0886e5 Jan. 9, 2021, 9:41 a.m. No.12426461   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6481

Q#4881

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 10/17/2020 12:36:26

https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746

There is 'Q'. 1

There are 'Anons'. 2

There is no 'Qanon'.3

Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?

DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?

Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].

You are correct, CJ.

Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]

Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.

Q

Anonymous ID: 0886e5 Jan. 9, 2021, 9:56 a.m. No.12426682   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The House's new rules on gender pronouns was all along an attack on the Bible.

 

Nothing more. Everything else is an excuse.

 

See their attacks as attacks on the Bible and it all makes sense.

Anonymous ID: 0886e5 Jan. 9, 2021, 10:04 a.m. No.12426809   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6824

>>12426784

Nah, you're just trying to use narrative tactics to discourage viewers.

 

JP is on point.

 

You didn't even watch the video, you posted a reply in less time than the video length.

 

JP is over the target.