Anonymous ID: d44e19 Jan. 9, 2021, 9:41 a.m. No.12426460   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6607

>>12426434

>The Left naturally prefers lies to truth, ugliness to beauty, chaos to order, tyranny to freedom, and human suffering to human flourishing. For they are the culture of death, the children of darkness. They are spiteful mutants who want revenge for being born. They wont rest until the entire world is as ugly on the outside as they are on the inside.

Anonymous ID: d44e19 Jan. 9, 2021, 9:56 a.m. No.12426679   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12426634

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variazh

 

The first written documents date the settlement back to in 1419 as Waręż. In 1538, the settlement was granted the Magdeburg rights. Waręż had a significant population of Jews living in the city: in 1880, there were 880 Jews; in 1900, there were 964 Jews; in 1921, there were 520 Jews. During the Holocaust, Waręż's entire Jewish population was killed.

 

Until the Soviet invasion of Poland in 1939, Waręż was a part of the Polish Lwów Voivodeship (Sokal County) and – since 1934 – seat of the Gmina Waręż, a rural administrative district of Poland (Waręż does not appear on lists of towns since at least 1931, and prior to this it only had market town status (miasteczko), which was considered a rural unit in an administrative sense).

 

During the war, the settlement became a part of the Hrubieszów County, which after the war returned to the Lublin Voivodeship. During the 1951 Polish–Soviet territorial exchange, Waręż along with most of the pre-war Sokal County was transferred from the People's Republic of Poland to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. There, the settlement was renamed to Novoukrainka (Ukrainian: Новоукраїнка), a name which it kept until 1989 when it was reverted to its original—albeit Ukrainian variant of the name, "Variazh."

Anonymous ID: d44e19 Jan. 9, 2021, 10:23 a.m. No.12427161   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/1187/giuffre-v-maxwell/

 

ORDER: The Court does not read the protective order, as presently entered, to give the parties unrestricted authority to disclose publicly the confidential materials from Maxwell–not least of all because the parties only may agree to downgrad e confidentiality designations for materials that the "designating party has subsequently produced in this action," i.e., only materials that Ms. Giuffre alone designated as confidential in Maxwell. To avoid any doubt, however, the part ies shall append to the end of the definition of "Confidential Information" in the protective order the underlined language at the end of the following excerpt, which makes clear that the parties cannot agree to unseal the identities o f non-party Does where that information is still sealed in Maxwell: (As further set forth herein this Order.) The parties shall file a revised protective order with this language appended to the definition of "Confidential Information." SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 1/6/2021) (va)