Anonymous ID: f0d400 Jan. 9, 2021, 10:47 a.m. No.12427478   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7522

>>12427247

You do realize that willingly subjecting oneself to look at fat lady porn as "retaliation" is far moar disturbing than allowing someone else to leech off one's internet connect just to have an "excuse" to look at fat lady porn?

Anonymous ID: f0d400 Jan. 9, 2021, 11:05 a.m. No.12427757   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12427306

This just makes me want to bitch-slap whitler that much moar for fucking dicking innocent citizens around over a decade since the state started its racketeering scam of the "medical" industry.

Questions: If cannabis, a Natural God-given "substance", has always had "medicinal benefits", under what "authority" were judges allowed to pass down "judgements" which had serious impacts on citizens health & well-being? Would that not be "medical fraud"? Furthermore, since cannabis is a Natural substance, gifted to us by Nature's God, does that not make each and every individual "prosecuted" then now a victim of "religious persecution"?

 

Prohibition of a Natural medicinal substance most certainly seems like a severe violation of our First Amendment Rights. If the very "law" itself was unlawful, as it most certainly would be going against the very Supreme Law of the Land, then any and all fines and additional punishments can and should be deemed "excessive". Thus, any and all fines and punishments attached to any and all "convictions" would thereby be in violation of the Eighth Amendment, as well. Further analysis under this train of thought reveals that these were not the only two Amendments to then be violated. "Sensitive subject" incoming…