Anonymous ID: 32e6ee Jan. 9, 2021, 1:03 p.m. No.12429599   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The Capitol: So Much Suspicious Evidence

 

It's our own fault. We allowed Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to control the narrative while Google controlled the answers to any questions.

 

They now believe they can define what happened on January 6, 2021 with impunity and we will accept their lies as truth.

 

We the people, however, are all too aware of what they are trying to accomplish, having been witness to the Hunter Biden story dissolving into the ether from inaccessibility and the silencing of any dissent as they stole a presidency.

 

For the entire year, the left has tried to provoke the right into violence. On Wednesday, they got what they wished for. Or conversely, they infiltrated a peaceful demonstration with Antifa and carried out a successful false flag operation.

 

They Tell Us

 

This was all Trump's fault. We know this because for the past four years, we have been told everything is Trump's fault. And I would wager, they will tell us for the next four years, everything is Trump's fault. As a matter of fact, when someone writes the acknowledged history of the United States of America's Second Civil War, it will be Trump's fault as well.

 

Funny Thing

 

Having watched some part of almost all the Trump rallies and having never seen anyone wearing helmets, backpacks, headscarves, or any degree of blackout with a tool dangling from their belts, it was surprising to see so many of the so-called rioters so clad at this "rebellion."

 

In the now-famous picture of seven guys scaling the wall to the Capitol Building, one can see people already at the precipice. Those are the ones who walked up the stairs (just outside the frame) when the entirely inadequate security melted away.

 

Wow, it is almost as if it is a staged photo reminiscent of the dozen versions of the Russians raising the flag over the Reichstag in 1945 or Pelosi's garage.

 

Me? I would have taken the stairs, but then I would not have been wearing a headscarf and a backpack with a tool dangling from my belt as three of the four nearest the top were begging for the director to yell, "Cut!"

 

Why wasn't there adequate security, and why weren't those who were present armed? I guess, no one would want an Antifa, Harvard-educated political science major to get hurt when they did what they always do: break the window of the store for the ignorant pawns to loot.

 

One can be forgiven for thinking security was purposely left deficient and unarmed to provoke what might happen should a sampling of Antifa intermixed within the mostly peaceful crowd be successful at impelling the desired riot.

 

False flag? Hitler put less effort into setting up Poland with Operation Himmler at the inception of WWII, the "big one" (as Archie Bunker used to say).

 

No security and no weapons — what a surprise. It's almost as if they wanted this. Yet they still managed to kill a woman by shooting through a door. Deadly force is allowed only when you fear for your life or the lives of others. From multiple videos, one can see that what Ashli Babbitt was doing had not yet met that threshold.

 

But then again, as a Trump-supporter, she was not a member of a protected class, so her death, while meaningless, was warranted.

 

You see, when you are meaningless, either you do as you are told or you deserve to die.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/01/the_capitol_false_flag_rebellion_or_civil_war_ii.html

Anonymous ID: 32e6ee Jan. 9, 2021, 1:04 p.m. No.12429617   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9760

Silence Will Be the Next Hate Crime

 

Attacking so-called "hate speech" has proven an effective Trojan horse technique by BLM and Antifa social justice warriors, who have incorporated Critical Race Theory (CRT) into their pernicious plans to dismantle the Constitution. After all, who wants to defend hate speech? But connecting the jurisprudential dots reveals that the whiter-than-snow "cause" of inner-city black suffering is the battering ram to bypass the very liberties that nurtured the abolitionist and Civil Rights movements. Might this chaos extend even to the point of criminalizing silence as hate speech?

 

CRT does not hide its plans. Quoting Audre Lorde, BLM brazenly declares:

 

For the master's tools will never dismantle the master's house. They may allow us to temporarily beat him at his own game, but they will never enable us to bring about genuine change.

 

Note that "genuine change" means attacking good police, burning black businesses, and physically assaulting people whose ideas you don't wish to hear. Actions speak louder than words: "genuine change" means destruction, not healing; hate, not love; dictatorship.

 

United States Supreme Court precedents hold that Nazis rightfully assemble on state land, and the KKK has a right to preach its hate on public streets. These are classic liberal court cases, a product of the once-tolerant left. Yet today's far left says the First Amendment is an instrument of oppression, not liberty:

 

CRT scholars have critiqued many of the assumptions that they believe constitute the ideology of the First Amendment[.] … [I]nstead of helping to achieve healthy and robust debate, the First Amendment actually serves to preserve the inequities of the status quo; there can be no such thing as an objective or content neutral interpretation in law[.] … [S]ome speech should be viewed in terms of the harm it causes, rather than all speech being valued on the basis of it being speech; and there is no "equality" in "freedom" of speech.

 

This slippery slope eviscerates the First Amendment: the issue in Skokie was whether government may ban speech by Nazis that Jews (including actual Holocaust survivors) found deeply traumatizing. The Court held that "feelings" are not a standard to proscribe speech.

 

CRT "scholars" seek to splice a host-killing new gene into America's constitutional DNA, to alter that standard of "speech that incites violence" to "speech that makes snowflakes melt." If speech is "viewed in terms of the harm it causes," what harms are inflicted to others' Constitutional liberties if their speech is prohibited because of the potential subjective insult to the hearer — as with, say, Confederate flags, or religious scriptures, or the misapplication of evolving pronouns? Next up are "microaggressions" and the crime of silence.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/01/silence_will_be_the_next_hate_crime.html

Anonymous ID: 32e6ee Jan. 9, 2021, 1:19 p.m. No.12429821   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9839 >>0096 >>0253

US Attorney Opens Federal Excessive Force Investigation Into Shooting Death of USAF Veteran Ashli Babbitt Who Was Shot by Capitol Police

 

US Attorney Michael Sherwin confirmed to CBS reporter Catherine Herridge that his office has opened a federal excessive force investigation into the shooting of Ashli Babbitt, an unarmed woman entered the US Capitol building on Wednesday.

 

The same US Attorney’s Office has also opened a homicide investigation into the death of Capitol Hill Officer Brian Sicknick.

 

Ashli Babbitt, a 14-year veteran from San Diego who served 4 tours with the US Air Force as a high-level security officer was shot and killed by Capitol Police on Wednesday.

 

Ashli Babbitt was shot through a window on a closed door by an officer.

 

Babbitt appeared to be standing behind a group of people who were attempting to gain entry into the chamber.

 

Police had barricaded the doors and were attempting to keep the patriot protesters out — and then drew their weapons.

 

They opened fired and shot Ashli in the neck.

 

She was wheeled out of the Capital in a stretcher covered in blood and later pronounced dead.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/us-attorney-opens-federal-excessive-force-investigation-shooting-death-usaf-veteran-ashli-babbitt-shot-capitol-police/

Anonymous ID: 32e6ee Jan. 9, 2021, 1:20 p.m. No.12429832   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0096 >>0253

HIT PIECE

 

Roseanne Boyland, who died in Capitol riot, quit drugs only to spiral into QAnon

 

 

Rosanne Boyland had been busted for drugs over and over. Finally, she stepped up and got clean. She even wanted to be a sobriety counselor.

 

But she changed in other ways, too. She turned conservative. She bought into the conspiracy cult QAnon and she refused to believe Joe Biden defeated President Trump.

 

And her denial of Biden’s victory is what ultimately led to her death Wednesday, caught in the siege at the Capitol, her family told the Associated Press. She was one of three rioters who died of medical emergencies. A woman was fatally shot and a police officer was killed.

 

“It cost her her life,” her sister, Lonna Cave, said.

 

Boyland, 34, of Kennesaw, Georgia, had sworn to her family that she wasn’t going to get caught up in anything violent. Cave pleaded with her not to make the trip to Washington.

 

“She promised me, ‘I’m going to stand on the sidelines. I’m just going to show my support,’” Cave said Friday outside her suburban Atlanta home.

see also

 

Rosanne Boyland, woman killed in DC riots, was trampled by crowd

 

The sisters fought about politics and QAnon, which contends e-retailer Wayfair is part of a secret cabal of child-sex traffickers. She glommed on to other conspiracy theories.

 

“It just spiraled,” said Cave, 39.

 

Boyland was a staunch Trump supporter, posting photos and videos of the president and posting wild allegations, including one that the pandemic was just a way to steal the November election.

 

Her last Twitter post was Wednesday, before Trump urged his supporters to march to the Capitol, where lawmakers were debating the Electoral College outcome. She retweeted a picture of thousands surrounding the Washington Monument.

 

https://nypost.com/2021/01/09/roseanne-boyland-who-died-in-capitol-quit-drugs-and-fell-to-qanon/

Anonymous ID: 32e6ee Jan. 9, 2021, 1:21 p.m. No.12429852   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9862 >>9887 >>0096 >>0253

No ‘Riot’ Charges for Trump as Video of Capitol Police Letting Protestors Enter Capitol Proliferates

 

As Democrats call for removing President Trump from office the Justice Department says it will not pursue charges against the President for anything related to January 6th

 

Two US Justice Department officials have gone on record saying President Trump will not be charged with any crimes related to the chaos that descended on the US Capitol Building on January 6, 2021.

 

Frustrated and angry Trump supporters, by some accounts incited by anarchist and Leftist agitators, descended on the US after being betrayed by Vice President Mike Pence who refused to exercise his constitutional right to move a contested election in the Electoral College to the US House for a vote of delegations.

 

The Capitol Building and several elected official’s offices – including the Office of the Speaker – were accessed and disrupted during the chaos. The House and Senate floors were also accessed by the aggrieved protesters. Reports have surfaced that laptops have gone missing.

 

Democrats leaders, led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), have called for the President’s removal from office with less than two weeks left in his term.

 

Many Republicans, who benefited in their re-elections from President Trump’s support, have also joined the call for his removal.

 

But Democrat’s removal efforts have run into a speedbump with news that the Department of Justice will not pursue charges against the President for any of the activity that happened on Capitol Hill on January 6, 2021.

 

When asked Friday during a conference call with reporters if the DoJ was considering charging any of the speakers at the rally that preceded the destructive chaos at the Capitol Building, a Justice Department official said “We don’t expect any charges of that nature.”

 

Later, another Justice Department official said the federal investigation is exclusively focused on criminal acts at the Capitol building.

 

https://nationalfile.com/no-riot-charges-for-trump-as-video-of-capitol-police-letting-protestors-enter-capitol-proliferates/