https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/08/us/politics/trump-pelosi-nuclear-military.html?

NYTimes contains juicy bits.

"In a phone call to the chairman, Gen. Mark A. Milley, Ms. Pelosi appeared to be seeking to have the Pentagon leadership essentially remove Mr. Trump from his authorities as the commander in chief. That could be accomplished by ignoring the president’s orders or slowing them by questioning whether they were issued legally".

Pelosi seeking to remove the President from the chain of command. In other words drunk on vodka and power, having talked social media into banning POTUS, but also angry that her laptop was seized, Pelosi stupidly calls General Mark Milley to feel him out about the military conducting a coup on her behalf. THIS IS FUCKING HUGE.

"But some Defense Department officials clearly resented being asked to act outside of the legal authority of the 25th Amendment and saw it as more evidence of a broken political system. They said that some political leaders were trying to get the Pentagon to do the work of Congress and cabinet secretaries, who have legal options to remove a president".

"…and saw it as more evidence of a broken political system." AGAIN HUGE AND FROM NYTIMES

Isn't this exactly the kind of situation that would REQUIRE military intervention? If the legislative (ie political) and the judicial branches

are not acting in compliance with the Constitution and the Executive Branch requests the military to assist, this is exactly the kind of compliance and legal hurdles they would need to answer internally?

and there is more…

"Mr. Trump, they noted, is still the commander in chief; unless he is removed, the military is bound to follow his lawful orders. While military officials can refuse to carry out orders they view as illegal — or slow the process by sending those orders for careful legal review — they cannot remove the president from the chain of command. That would amount to a military coup, the officials said".

So in fact Pelosi, who is seen by some in the military as the leader of part of a broken legislative branch was requesting the military conduct a coup on her behalf.

If that isn't an act of treason in and of itself, I don't know what is.