>>12439684
No opinion about Byrne other than “monitored Q for a few weeks” doesn’t mean jack shit.
Basically, as a Q fag, I wouldn’t listen to anyone who has only recently started digging into Q.
When longtime Q supports point out things that are issues I will listen.
However, I’ve been through so many Q proofs, and have also discovered some original Q proofs, that I 100% believe Q is real in the sense that they are a govt insider working with Trump.
Regards Trump’s intentions and whether the plan will be successful, that is up for debate. But (imo) Q has proven themselves as an insider enough times.