https://web.archive.org/web/20210104063852/https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/1345982852949704704
Probably getting DDOS.
ConservativeBeaver cited
The Italian National Prosecutor’s Office confirmed it ordered the arrests, and filed the charges.
I've checked
https://www.giustizia.it/giustizia/it/homepage.page
Couldn't find announcement.
Your 'debunking' centers on ad hominem though, so…if anyone is not to be trusted it's you, anon.
Source for ConservativeBeaver is
"The Italian National Prosecutor’s Office confirmed it ordered the arrests, and filed the charges."
If that is true, there should be MANY news outlets reporting this, because it would be stupid if THE CONSERVATIVE FUCKING BEAVER, A CANADA WEBSITE, WOULD HAVE AN EXCLUSIVE FROM THE ITALIAN NATIONAL FUCKING PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE.
https://www.giustizia.it/
Conservativebeaver.com is the only source of the claim about the Pope.
They cite:
"The Italian National Prosecutor’s Office confirmed it ordered the arrests, and filed the charges."
HOW DID CONSERVATIVEBEAVER.COM ACQUIRE THIS ALLEGED INFORMATION FROM THE ITALIAN NATIONAL PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE????
WHY DIDT THEY CITE A LINK?
ARE WE TO TRUST A RANDOM WEBSITE IN CANADA AS SOURCE FOR AN ALLEGED ANNOUNCEMENT IN ITALY?
Q#4881
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 10/17/2020 12:36:26
https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'.3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q
Use Google translate. It's a website in ITALY.
Bingo.
If we see a crazy claim 'reported'….THE VERY FIRST THING THAY MUST BE DONE IS TO TRACE THE CHAIN OF CUSTODY N THE INFORMATION TRANSMISSION.
You do this by ASKING THE Q "What is your source?"
We see ConservativeBeaver.com 'reporting' a story.
Before we post the story as true, we must ask "What is their source?"
The beaver cites IN TEXT ONLY, NO LINK, "The Italian National Prosecutor's Office".
Now why would that website NOT provide a link to THE OTHER SIDE OF THE FUCKING PLANET?
WHY WOULD THEY ONLY CITE THEIR SOURCE IN TEXT FORMAT ONLY?
By using TEXT, the conservativebeaver IS IN EFFECT CLAIMING TO BE ORIGINAL SOURCE FOR 'PUBLIC' ANNOUNCEMENT ABOUT AN ARREST OF THE POPE.
Does that makes any sense?
No.
It is A BAD IDEA to repeat AS IF IT WERE TRUE a story that LACKS the FULL chain of custody in the logic of the information transmission from node to node.
There is NULL linkage in the chain of custody of the information between theConservativeBeaver.com, a Canadian website, and the Italian National Prosecutor's Office, an Italian government org.
STOP STOP STOP STOP REPOSTING STORIES THAT FAIL THE TEST FOR CONSISTENT CHAIN OF CUSTODY IN THE LOGIC OF INFORMATION TRANSMISSION.
A STORY IS NOT TRUE SIMPLY BECAUSE IT MAY FEEL GOOD TO BELIEVE IT IS TRUE.
Read the attached paper and LEARN the science of information, of signals, of noise, of noise to signal ratios, andFIGHT LIKE FLYNN
Have you checked the conservative beaver's source?
Lesson #1 of information logic
A story that fails the chain of custody in the information, from source to 'report', IS NEITHER TRUE NOR FALSE IN YOUR MIND.
It is a fuzzy wave function that includes true and false states in a superpositioning.
It is PREMATURE to think it either conclusively true or conclusively false.
As far as your mind's capability can function, there is both states 'co-existing' as POTENTIALS ONLY.
At this point that information IS NOISE.
IT IS NOISE BETWEEN 'SOURCE' (CLEAR) AND 'REPORT' (UNBOUNDED/UNTETHERED).
Unless and until you as an individual can detect the chain of custody in the information transmission from 'source' to 'report', AND STATEMENT YOU MAKE that presumes, assumes, suggests, or concludes that the 'report' is true, or false, YOU ARE ALLOWING YOUR MIND TO PASSIVELY BE DETERMINED BY NOISE, AND NOT SOURCE.
YOUR MIND MUST ALWAYS BE ULTIMATELY DRIVEN BY SOURCE FOR YOU TO THINK CONSISTENT WITH REALITY AS IT IS.
THERE IS NO 'QANON' - Q4881