Anonymous ID: 60aec2 Jan. 10, 2021, 2:41 p.m. No.12451468   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1496

>>12451368

Oooooooh….wait a second. This "stealing the laptop from Nancy's office" story wasn't sitting right with me. The penny drops.

 

So we're to assume that Nancy just left a laptop with sensitive data on her desk? As if she didn't know this Capital Bldg invastion (stunt) wasn't coming?

 

That Lt Gen Tom McInerney character who talks about the stolen laptop puts on a very good performance. Just a harmless old man. But look at his history. When will we learn?

 

PER WIKIPEDIA:

 

Beginning in January 2002, McInerney was a military analyst on Fox News until May 2018.

 

McInerney was a staunch advocate for the Iraq War.[3] In 2002, he said a military campaign against Iraq, would be "shorter" than the 42 days it took to complete the Persian Gulf War in 1991, and further, "It is going to be absolutely awesome, and that's why this war, if we do it properly, will go very quick, and we'll have less civilian casualties than we did last time."[4]

 

In 2004, he claimed without evidence that with the aid of a Russian Special Forces team with GRU, Saddam had transported weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) to Syria and the Bekaa Valley in Lebanon for safekeeping.[5] Although McInerney said they had been moved to three places in Syria and one in Lebanon, the final report of the Iraq Survey Group, by Charles A. Duelfer, special adviser on Iraqi weapons to the C.I.A., concluded that any stockpiles had been destroyed long before the war and that transfers to Syria were "unlikely."[6]

 

In 2006, McInerney advocated for regime change via military action against Iran and North Korea.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_McInerney

Anonymous ID: 60aec2 Jan. 10, 2021, 2:54 p.m. No.12451705   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>12451616

It's a con to try to further undermine any disclosures coming from POTUS or white hats about laptop contents. The cabal might be hoping to plant a seed that such disclosures are "compromised" or faked by a bunch of hoodlums (fake Qanons).

Anonymous ID: 60aec2 Jan. 10, 2021, 2:57 p.m. No.12451744   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1789 >>1927

Problem I have is that Gab was always comped before. Why are they suddenly not comped? Sure it's possible. The platform certainly worked a lot better than Gab! But until POTUS tells us about the plans for a new platform, then I'll treat Gab like any other social media platform: I'll use it and I'll also be suspicious of it. Q reminds us to remain on such platforms. But I don't yet have reason to think that Gab is suddenly a white hat when they were clearly founded by black hats.