Anonymous ID: e1ba68 Jan. 11, 2021, 1:12 a.m. No.12461285   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1356

>>12461213 pb

>>>12461164

>

>or maybe he just doesnt believe in Q..

>

>Lots of Patriots dont either.

 

AJ actually met the team that was larping as Q (Patriot Soapbox) and the truth came out โ€ฆ but out of professional courtesy AJ didn't blow their cover โ€ฆ it must have pissed AJ to no end that the upstarts were upstaging him and were telling their gullible followers that AJ is MOS โ€ฆ while he's just an entertainer, a showman โ€“ It was the Middle Q team, before Jim and Ron took over.

Anonymous ID: e1ba68 Jan. 11, 2021, 1:21 a.m. No.12461363   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1380

>>12461286

I think I've read the big fat Military Budget Omnibus Bill Donald signed in last Dec(?) included a small item slipped in โ€“ a law that took away the presidential powers of invoking Insurrection act on his own w/o Congress โ€ฆ you might want to look in to that

Anonymous ID: e1ba68 Jan. 11, 2021, 1:22 a.m. No.12461373   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1384

>>12461352

>>>12461337

>

>>Police Officer That Rioters Hit With Fire Extinguisher Dies, Making Capitol Siege a Murder Scene

>

>so fucking Ashli Babbit DIDNT die, then?

>

>what the fuck

>

>kek

 

the guy who shot Babbit, a cop or Pence's security acted in official capacity so no murder

Anonymous ID: e1ba68 Jan. 11, 2021, 1:44 a.m. No.12461547   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12461388

there are ways to cope like the theory that "sometimes its not enough to tell the people the truth, you have to show them โ€ฆ losing the P_elec was always the goal, losing the senate a bonus โ€ฆ now people will see how bad Biden is, turst the Plan" and the totally ingenious theory that the Military Patriot scientists are able to peacefully transfer the power consciousness of POTUS in to the rotten head of Biden and transmit COMMs, while other people think Joe is just blabbering confused neonsense โ€ฆ decoding that could keep anons occupied for years

Anonymous ID: e1ba68 Jan. 11, 2021, 1:52 a.m. No.12461618   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1635

>>12461548

>>>12461494

>

>Remember that Q drop about, "how do you introduce evidence?" I remember it.

 

"We have it all" but a parallel construction is needed โ€ฆthe miltiary is the only way didn't imply a coup couple of years ago, but going by the book thru the legal precess ittroducin evidence for crimes the MI knows, using the parallel construction