>>1246384

That's one of the huge questions IMO.

I think DJT sees that things have to go in a certain order. First, the law enforcement and intelligence agencies have to be cleaned up. Then, they will be in a position to do mass arrests and trials. During these stages, U.S. energy policy needs to play to its strengths (which are still largely based on fossil fuels).

The swamp has been the group that has blocked the introduction of breakthrough energy technologies, breakthrough space propulsion, etc. Just see Eugene Mallove's case and how he chronicled the suppression of cold fusion.

However, once the swamp has been drained, it will be possible to introduce the new energy tech. Cold fusion (LENR / low-energy nuclear reactions) probably is probably the most well-developed of the technologies at this point, with thousands of peer-reviewed academic papers outlining how to do it. Not to mention all the LENR companies springing up like Brillouin, Brilliant Light Power, Leonardo Corp…

Trump knows that breakthrough energy has to be introduced gradually to reduce shocks to the macro economy. So there's no problem with pushing coal for the time being. Everything must go according to schedule.

>>1246394

Yeah, if DJT tried to commercialize breakthrough energy tech now, it would disrupt U.S. relations with Middle EAst oil exporting nations at a time when their cooperation is needed on dealing with Israel, Iran, and Syria.

But it must be on DJT's agenda. He hinted at this in his inaugural address.

>>1246394

Good summary of where LENR (cold fusion) technology is today and who is in line to commercialize it.

As anons mentioned above, the problem now is not that the basic science hasn't been done or the generators haven't been patented. The problems have to do with institutional resistance to change.

https:// www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-revolutionary-lenrs-for-power-generation-accelerating-development-path-from-present-trl4-to-trl9-april-9-2018

>>1246424

See the slideshare below. The tech already exists. We don't need more time to "develop" it. That's already been done over the last 30 years.

The tasks now are to figure out how to introduce breakthrough energy tech in a way that doesn't cause hardship to workers in the fossil fuels economy, and to ensure the new tech isn't weaponized by bad actors.

>>1246436

https:// www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-revolutionary-lenrs-for-power-generation-accelerating-development-path-from-present-trl4-to-trl9-april-9-2018

>>1246433

Key breakthrough energy patents in recent years:

https:// animpossibleinvention.com/2015/08/25/rossi-has-been-granted-us-patent-on-the-e-cat/

https:// patents.justia.com/assignee/solar-hydrogen-holdings-inc

https:// patents.justia.com/inventor/randell-l-mills

>>1246432

Yes, Lockheed just got a new miniaturized fusion patent recently… but they've been using this stuff since the 80s if not before.

A big task for Trump has got to be to work with the military to see which technologies make sense to apply in the civilian sector and which are too powerful or dangerous to use outside the military.

>>1246432

Lockheed new miniaturized fusion power plant

http:// www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/19652/lockheed-martin-now-has-a-patent-for-its-potentially-world-changing-fusion-reactor

Mitsubishi has been getting a lot of patents in this area too. There is a popular impression that free energy research is only being done by eccentric guys in their garages who make Youtube videos. Not so.

>>1246406

It's one reason why LENR will be so big. The direct product of LENR reactions is heat, so it's perfect for boilers and furnaces. Using LENR for electricity requires something like a Stirling Engine to turn the heat into electricity.

>>1246583

Steel will of course be very important for quite some time. However, we will also see that nanotech (including graphene-based materials) become used for a lot of the purposes we use steel for today.

The nanotech card probably plays into Trump's thinking about the long-term future of the U.S. steel industry.

>>1246598

One example of a synthetic alternative to steel that we're already starting to see put into use is the FRPs (Fibre-Reinforced Polymers), which work well for bridges, balconies, and lots of other things.

https:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095809917300887

Overall, I think gradual is best when it comes to replacing steel or fossil fuels. The gradual nature of the roll-out reduces abrupt shocks to the economy, specialized workers, etc.

>>1246628

>But try telling them that… It just ain't flying…

The mind control is deep

>>1246713

Best book you could read on this subject, in my opinion is "UFOs and the National Security State" by Richard Dolan. A solid work of historical research - nothing to do with people "channeling aliens" through meditation or whatever.

Dolan shows through declassified government and military documents that the highest levels of US Government and Military have certainly concluded that some UFOs are extraterrerestrial in origin, at least since the early 1950s.

And if they reached that conclusion nearly 70 years ago, we should probably adopt that conclusion too. As to how this may relate to current world events, that is a big and complex question.

https:// www.amazon.com/UFOs-National-Security-State-Chronology/dp/1571743170

>>1246748

Very good background on this topic comes from Grant Cameron, who collected a lot of information from the Clinton White House on their (aborted?) plans to say something big (though not necessarily truthful) to the public about UFOs and ET life.

>>1246916

It's an important point. A better term would be "breakthrough energy" rather than "free energy".

The breakthrough energy sources like LENR and other forms of zero point energy are not free, but the cost of power is less than 5% of the current cost; and furthermore they are compact, non-weather-dependant, and non-polluting. So they are superior in just about every imaginable way.

>>1246916

The other cost involved in so-called 'free energy' is all the R&D, which over the past 30 hears has cost billions, and will need to be repaid somehow (most likely sales of power and power generation systems).

While the basic science and robust prototypes and test model already exist for breakthrough energy tech, still many investments need to be made in scaling up systems from the 10KW range to the megawatt or gigawatt range; and also one has to build the mass production facilities for generators and power plants.

None of that is free, but in the long run it will save lots of money in comparison with the present system.

>>1246989

Long-time diggers, anons, truthseekers et al. on this board know that we're engaged in a deadly struggle.

As I look back on my own years of digging and redpilling through various means, it looks like a literal battlefield to me – because it is, and it's littered with so many fellowanons who have lost their lives in this struggle, to say nothing of those who have lost their sanity, their jobs, families, etc.

It's naive to condemn those who have lost something short of their life (i.e. those who've lost "merely" their money, their marriage, or whatever) in the quest to MAGA and to rid our society of the satanic scum. Those who make such condemnations just haven't been in the struggle long enough, or are merely pretending to seek the truth and to MAGA.

>>1247010

Doesn't Beltane begin April 30?

VietnamVetAnons will know April 30, 1975 was the day the commies in Indochina finally conquered Saigon and sent that country into abject poverty and dictatorship. A fitting sacrifice to the Vietcong's luciferian gods.

>>1247033

I'm not sure how often the Daytime Emmy's are televised anyway, but I suspect they don't dare televise the event now because their religion compels them to perform certain rituals which the public has now caught on to. Whereas 10 years ago, very few could recognize the satanic elements of these events.

So it's done behind closed doors now.

Not sure what Bibi's gonna say, but I'm sure it will be far from the truth.

>>1247112

Yes, it's a common tactic in NASA and other major space agencies. How many times have we been told they sent an orbiter to Mars and then right when it was entering orbit - POOF! - "we lost contact with it".

now, even though it was paid for with taxpayer funds, the space agency is not required to share data from the orbiter with the public or academic institutions.