>Now they are in jail, how can this be part of the plan?
Arrests do not imply incarceration, Anon. In order to answer your question more information is needed. Who you 'follow' or what you thought you 'saw' have no bearing on the commission of a crime. If they trespassed or broke the law perhaps they should have been arrested, perhaps not, but we don't have the facts to consider. Many suspect there was a simultaneous 'Resistance' or Antifa op. We just don't know yet.
Not that long ago Jim had all of the 8chan servers in his personal vehicle while seeking a hosting site. There may be a DOD domain involved, but Jim runs this place on a limited budget. Do you pay to post here, Anon?
Q 770:
>James Dolan. Dead suicide
>Aaron swartz. Dead suicide
>Kevin Paulson. Turned over securedrop to Freedom of the Press
John Perry Barlow - 187 post name [DROP].
@Snowden
You are now a liability.
Q
Q 760:
Thank you for showing the world how Clowns pass the narrative to journalists @ 4am.
Re_read crumbs re: SecureDrop.
John Perry Barlow.
Q
Q !UW.yye1fxo No.70 📁
Jan 27 2018 13:09:33 (EST)
@Snowden.
The clock is ticking.
How's Russia?
[Mr. Contractor]
Freedom of the Press.
John Perry Barlow.
https://freedom.press📁
SecureDrop [Whistleblowers]?
SecureDrop>Clowns In America.
NOBODY IS SAFE.
Q
>The viral claims that Trump signed the Insurrection Act over the weekend are not supported by evidence.
The Act was signed in 1807. It does not require a signature. The President is free to invoke the act - or any related law - as needed.
They are quite straightforward, Anon:
10 U.S. Code § 252 - Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority
Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.
10 U.S. Code § 253 - Interference with State and Federal law
The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—
(1)so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or
(2)opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.
In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.