Anonymous ID: 0a3a42 Jan. 11, 2021, 2:57 p.m. No.12471592   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1803 >>1941

>>12470634

>>12470644

 

The alternative news media and social media are filled with ways to connect the dots. Is it really coincidence that certain words are used in certain ways towards knowledge of certain institutions?

 

What would I mean by that?

 

The word "washingtonian" - why would someone use such an obscure word to describe someone?

 

The same rough time the CIA would actually decide to use the same reference to an organization they pay attention to?

 

Did you not notice the CIA changed its logo to black and white roughly within the same time as other celebrities changed their avatar on twitter to black and white. You noticed one but not the other. Ask yourself why it's some odd trend.

 

This is what I'm implying by saying connecting pieces of media together. No one will just come out and tell you, which is what most people magically expect even though they are on here to try to connect dots that other people would not tell them. Why would they tell you when you refuse to believe it? They can still easily use it over your head if that's true.

 

It's always right there. If you see enough news, you start to make enough connects naturally. But the ones that matter are the concepts of PICKING UP COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN OTHER PEOPLE ACROSS MEDIA. It's not only what they say verbatim, but also what they say that has implication to other people. If I agree that my friend goes to the pub with me and we know each other very well because we share the same ideas, we know an implication but when we say one word, someone thinks we're just talking about a mundane topic. Yet the friend understands the implication because of a prior conversation the night before. That implication then prompts that friend's action to do something that is seemingly random and unrelated to the casual observer. This happens endlessly in tradecraft and has been known since prior to even world war two in cryptographic texts. Cryptography is not only encrypting communications but also OBSCURING them. This was the primary basis for using the NAVAJO WIND TALKERS that confused any Asians listening.

 

INCLUDING ON VOA… You know the references that were made on the radio communications in the movie RED DAWN?? Most intelligence agencies use social media now to do the same exact thing and have for years. And now we're all the sudden talking about the VOA again? As media is being shut down, same ideas will be used on the original platform for which it was designed. If you're just saying "what is this nonsense?" then you don't know the cryptographic history of the methods of these intelligence agencies.

 

If I could enumerate all the ways the general public simply rejects methods out of disbelief - do you not think someone would instantly take advantage of that and use it against you? Hillary did exactly that when the general public did not believe that she would do things to children which is the primary reason we knew she got away with it. PAY ATTENTION.