Anonymous ID: cf26d2 Jan. 11, 2021, 7:35 p.m. No.12475587   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5612 >>5737 >>5926 >>6022 >>6112

>>12475354

Q#4881

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 10/17/2020 12:36:26

https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746

There is 'Q'. 1

There are 'Anons'. 2

There is no 'Qanon'.3

Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?

DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?

Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].

You are correct, CJ.

Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]

Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.

Q

Anonymous ID: cf26d2 Jan. 11, 2021, 7:49 p.m. No.12475794   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5839

>>12475442

>The FBI is just as criminal ridden today as it was in 2016.

That's false.

7th floor no more.

Many fired/forced out.

Fake News isn't defending or protecting the FBI like they did during impeachment and special counsel fiascos.

Not saying it's perfect, but to claim "it's just as corrupt as 2016" is to display a massive ignorance of happenings since then.