Anonymous ID: 2c5800 Jan. 12, 2021, 12:01 p.m. No.12484818   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12484739

Q#4881

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 10/17/2020 12:36:26

https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746

There is 'Q'. 1

There are 'Anons'. 2

There is no 'Qanon'.3

Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?

DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?

Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].

You are correct, CJ.

Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]

Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.

Q

Anonymous ID: 2c5800 Jan. 12, 2021, 12:04 p.m. No.12484878   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4905 >>4920

>>12484825

>Desperate attempt to flip burden of proof on Anons to 'disprove' in order retain authority to judge own shilling, as opposed to proving claims with true source.

Point proven.

See

>>12484775

Selfkill

Muhjoo shill pushing Marxist (Jew) polylogism to slander Anons