>>12490037 (pb)
why are they called
'antifascist'
when in fact they are 'agitational fascists'?
so a correct term would be 'agitational fascists'
or 'agit-fascists'.
It's a nice story.
and I understand why.
and when it's all through no one can say 'he truned into a dictator and blah blah blah' because technic-tainmental resolution of it will be . . .
I can't say for sure but I'm starting to grasp it even better so that no one can ever say that he turned into a despot and reinstalled himself.
No, our True and Real and Best President and Hero of the Century will be safe and away and not involved when the dominoes come tumbling down.
Arre ya listening, congress cuttie weenie?
this place lately is about keeping the flow of communication going. We use it to get and give impressions of current events.
those who seek to control others only are concerned with shutting off the interaction.
and you agreeing with that kind of thing, by trying to drive us away with discouragment, puts you on the wrong side of the argument, most will agree.
elections are about doing what the public wants. and if you don't let them taaauuwwk amungst themselves (he lives on the road with the roceket rocks of maga)
if you try and suppress the free expressive talk of Liberty minded people, you don't beliee in elected repbulican government, you're a fail all the way. Why would you ever be here but just to be and idgit-provocaturd?
One man .
one man
75 million citizens who voted for him
what are worried about?
if you have no faith in other people, and always believe the worst about others, then I'd ask why you're not so scared that you wouldn't even dare post here. I mean someoen knows who you are now . . .
did you hear the FBI Beauhunk today say about how you have to have a credible threat and that they are diligent and do not seek to confuse what he called "keyboard bravado" with real threats.
they look at individuals. they don't see a chalk board, they see a guy with a piece of chalk