>>12494894 (pb)

This is pretty though provoking but I am not sure Biden has enough acting ability to pull this off..

Of course he has been "acting" his whole life, but many people do that.

To actually ACT is something that requires practice and intellectual effort.

Still… food for thought here, and I think something is very "off" with the whole Biden situation… agree on that.

My take is that Biden and Harris are such losers that there is NO WAY the cabal was counting on them to put down what would basically be an armed insurrection if they got into office after stealing a win. I think they were being set up to lose,but that the cabal aime to "win" by lawfare and delay the results and use Congress to "temporarily" install some "moderate" as acting President… most likely some DS stooge with military cred….

(basically POTUS suckered them into really GOING for the steal, and ourguys have collected the evidence and will use it at the trials…)

>>12495528

>Politicians, by definintion, must be good at acting. That's what they do.

>Biden was dirty AF for decades.

actually agree… but politicians basically play a single role.. they find their "character" and play it… to SWITCH roles I think would be very difficult and I suspect Biden's intellect is not up to it…

>>12495500 (me)

to followup what I said there…

My thinking is that there is big constitutional "loophole" that many have missed… basically there is NO NEED to follow the Presidential Succession Act if not president has been "properly" chosen for the next term… By the 20th amendment Congress can basically do whatever it damn well chooses…. that's the CONSTITUTION and since Congress gets the power their anything they do can override the Presidential Succesion Act

Here's what I'm thinking of:

"and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President"

https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-20/

Now here's how I think they "plotted" it…. if they "successfully" forestalled a legit DJT win by lawfare, they still had the problem that even the rhinos and DS traitors like Liz Cheney could hardly go along with Nancy being installed as de facto Pres… they would HAVE to fight that or blow their covers

So my thinking is that someone would promose a "compromise" where a temporary acting President would be chosen to rule until the courts sorted out all the D party lawfare challenges… some DS asshole much more hardcore than sleepy Joe…

(But basically POTUS "suckered" then into trying to steal the win and now they're stuck with morons Biden/Harris…)

>>12495831

>I think Biden's been playing dumb.

I actually do agree with that.

GWB "played dumb" too and that was a big part of his schtick. But I'm still not sure Biden's up to the task of "changing his role". Or maybe more to the point, I'm not sure why our team OR their team would trust that he is.

Maybe Biden plays well as a folksy but corrupt pol, but he is a character actor, not a star…

>>12495852

>He intentionally ran as an imbecile and doddering old fool

Maybe so… not discounting the idea that he knows he was supposed to lose, but ourguys just told him to keep playing his same part…

but WHY would the DS opt for Biden then?

Can't see why THEY would choose him unless THEY thought they were setting him up… NO FUCKING WAY he is fit to put down an armed insurrection.. just sayin…

Here is my big question (re posts above)… if you trust the MSM, then Biden will become President next week and will ALSO face the challenge of putting down violent opposition… how in the fuck would the deep state choose Joe Biden for that job?