Anonymous ID: bfacb3 Jan. 13, 2021, 5:01 a.m. No.12497809   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7812

>>12497779

Yep…he's always been the token Protestant they parade around as the face of "fundamentalism." In the Trump era of conservatism, however, people like him are becoming increasingly more relevant as more Christians are having their eyes opened.

Anonymous ID: bfacb3 Jan. 13, 2021, 5:38 a.m. No.12498076   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12497868

>>12497908

Actually the letter was linked to last night on the JCS official site. Anon found it after searching.

 

https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/JCS%20Message%20to%20the%20Joint%20Force%20JAN%2012%2021.pdf

 

It's no matter…the JCS operate as an advisory board and lacks command authority as a body. But the memo is certainly not fake, unless one contends the JCS official site was hacked.

Anonymous ID: bfacb3 Jan. 13, 2021, 5:46 a.m. No.12498157   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8250

>>12498093

Some of the chiefs double as chief of operations in their respective branches. In the end, there is nothing in the memo that any of the chiefs should rightfully object to at this moment. The memo is irrelevant. What else are they going to say?

Anonymous ID: bfacb3 Jan. 13, 2021, 5:59 a.m. No.12498289   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12498250

Diagram was only to point out that members of the JCS are also chiefs in their branches. Point was that they are not generals who are wholly advisory - they serve in dual capacity.

 

But I agree they answer to the executive, and I also contend their signing of the memo does not in any way, shape, or form indicate they will not follow lawful and constitutional orders from Trump. In fact, the memo confirms it.