not since Nov 2017 faggot
I suppose it would be theoretically possible for Q to post as an Anon, but in order to again 'prove' it without violating natsec, there would have to be an autist discernable and explainable probability/mathematical connection or link between 'Q as Anon' drops and POTUS comms.
How's MSDNC's butthole?
Q#4881
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 10/17/2020 12:36:26
https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'.3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q
you need to stop pretending you're not projecting,
there is a tc there, and there was a tc in the next drops.