Anonymous ID: 4d9266 Jan. 13, 2021, 11:59 a.m. No.12503133   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3150 >>3166 >>3173 >>3189 >>3263 >>3408 >>3411 >>3434

Lesson for the newfags

 

If Q posts he will have a tripcode as listed at the top of the bread, it won’t be bold. It will probably have 10000 replies.

 

If Q posts without tripcode (due to it being compromised) he’ll probably be called a faggot and a shill. Proceed with mockery until the faggot verifies himself with a delta

Anonymous ID: 4d9266 Jan. 13, 2021, 12:10 p.m. No.12503310   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12503263

 

Not saying Q can’t post without a trip, I’m saying if there’s a post we believe to be Q or claims to be Q then extra verification should rightfully be expected

Anonymous ID: 4d9266 Jan. 13, 2021, 12:20 p.m. No.12503470   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12503411

 

That’s for Q to decide, I’m sure they could point to an account we know (Pompeo for example) and do a Kunword-to-tweet verification/misspelling verification/time second delta like the have done previously