Anonymous ID: d60db0 Jan. 13, 2021, 4:13 p.m. No.12507007   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12506974

May be worthNOTABLEfor discussion and dissection. I don't put a lot of hope behind authenticity but I also don't want to be caught with my pants down .

Anonymous ID: d60db0 Jan. 13, 2021, 4:23 p.m. No.12507162   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7526

>>12507062

>>12507060

>>12507065

Idea:

For those of us that haven't quite put this to rest yet, and are cautiously pessimistic, we would need more proof before any non-trip 'Q' post would be taken full sail.

 

So, since said poster said ID would verify, and since there was some sort of coincidence with it, reason would have it that said 'Q' poster could accurately predict their ID.

 

So, in light of this.

>>12505469 (pb) if you can predict your ID, then I think I would be more willing to believe this. Otherwise it goes into the 'fake' pile in my brain.