>>12513766 (PB)
>They are trying to secure a new tripcode.
They should burn the old code, then. Unless they have lost it.
@ Baker
>>12513766 (PB) should be added to notables regardless of validity, for historical reference.
>>12513766 (PB)
>They are trying to secure a new tripcode.
They should burn the old code, then. Unless they have lost it.
@ Baker
>>12513766 (PB) should be added to notables regardless of validity, for historical reference.
>They can secure it through their board.
Not if they have lost access.
Also past baker missed possible morse code comms from POTUS
>>12513572 (PB) >>12513612 (PB)
Nobody was saying it should be considered verified info, anon.
Well, do yourself a favor and setup dnscrypt using Simple DnsCrypt and enable only non-logging resolvers.
https://www.simplednscrypt.org/
>What's the purpose of this, Anon?
It's one step further than using OpenDNS.
Regular DNS traffic can be sniffed off the wire and intercepted by your ISP.
If you are finally waking up to this, put the correct fix in place which using DoH (DNS over HTTPS).
Dnscrypt Proxy is program which runs as a local DNS server but communicates with external revolvers via DoH.
You run DNS locally (over 127.0.0.1) and it works the same as a normal DNS server, so it can be used even on older versions of Windows.
The external queries are encrypted and sent to volunteer ran servers around the world, including OpenDNS if you like.
Have been running my own DNS resolver for many years, since they started screwing with thepiratebay.
Haven't looked back, very few problems and well worth being able to bypass domain level censorship.