>>12512567 Possibility that POTUS is the first arrested? (pb)
This looks like a real possibility. Here's why I think the objections to it are not well founded.
Objection 1: The president controls the military. If Biden is inaugurated, HE controls the military. We are fooked. >>12512593 (pb)
Answer:
Yes and no. Sure the president controls the military. But, did you read the entire post? With Trump on trial, discovery would not only vindicate Trump, but also completely fark Biden, Harris and the cabal. Public opinion, now split 50/50 between patriots/DS supporters, would sway bigly toward the patriot side. With Trump vindicated, arrests of DS would be imminent, regardless of who 'controls' the military.
Objection 2: Normies have already been living under tyranny for the last year! They don't need to "see true tyranny" by witnessing Biden inaugurated. >>12512629 (pb)
Answer:
Nope. Sorry. You may think they have witnessed tyranny enough to wake their asses up, but clearly they have not. Nearly 70 million people voted for Biden - for the DS. They aren't awake. The Great Awakening has woken up 70 - 80 million of us.(A very liberal estimate since many people who voted for Trump are still asleep but just voted for the R.) But nearly half the country is still asleep!!! If they were awake, we wouldn't be in this position. Will a Trump arrest REALLY wake them up? Will discovery during the trial wake them up? I'm not sure. But it's clear they aren't awake yet.
Objection 3: This can't happen because Q said things need to be "clean and swift." If this happens, we'd be in a full war because it would be TRUMP trying to overthrow the government at this point. >>12512696 (pb)
Answer:
We would not be in a 'full war' with Trump trying to overthrow the government. There would be a court case. That court case would potentially allow for Trump to present evidence that he himself is the victim of the DS. This would wake more people up and vindicate him. This is basically the opposite of a hot war. It's using the legal system to achieve the goal.
Objection 4: By allowing Biden to take control of office, Trump would be allowing a CCP traitor to occupy the presidency, thus violating his oath. >>12512696 (pb)
Answer
Trump would be allowing Biden to occupy the presidency? Biden was 'elected.' Trump and his supporters filed lawsuits and tried to win legally. They tried to persuade the Congress, and tried to win Constitutionally. I wouldn't call that "allowed." Biden and the DS stole it. I suppose you could say he 'allowed it' by not releasing all the information he has at this time. But maybe now isn't the right time. It seems convoluted to say that will have allowed Biden to take the presidency if he allows himself to be arrested for the purpose of waking everyone up to the crimes of the DS.