Anons, wanted to post this here because I didn't see it in the notables. You can get the entire text of the JCPOA here:
https://www.state.gov/e/eb/tfs/spi/iran/jcpoa/
I'm not a lawfag, this kind of stuff gives me sudden convenient diverticulitis. But it would likely provide an elegant proof of Q's post #1306, among other things.
This snippet off of the pic related article is interesting. The wording is consistent with the idea that Iran wasn't doing anything against the agreement. But this is really a check-mate: how can the media argue that something like this wasn't against the agreement without revealing what a shitty agreement it was in the first place? How could any American media argue that it's worse to go against the agreement than it is to make sure that Iran isn't developing nuclear weapons?
Russia's response has been, and will be, very interesting. Trump has called them out and given them a choice–let us hope that it is the right one, more for their sake than ours.
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/20531/new-syria-strikes-cause-earthquake-as-israel-drops-intelligence-bombshell-about-iran
Excellent. Everything everyone can do to call out media bias is important. Even the story itself was stupid–clearly meant to draw people's attention from the strike in Israel and Bibi's revelation.
>https://bigleaguepolitics.com/whistleblower-brennan-clapper-hacked-fisa-court-judge/
NOTABLE
pic related