>>12520140

>BAKER IS MNR DOODLE CANCER AND COMPED REMOVING Q WARFARE SECTION

so much for agreeing to stop fighting over putting your content in the Dough, Gerbil

I have seen your stuff in the notables and in the globals

just like we agreed

if its current, relevent, and baker decides its notable, it gets into notables

not a problem

but you constantly fighting with the kitchen over putting your content in the dough?

I though we agreed you would stop that?

-are you saying you are no longer willing to honor that agreement?

-I thought we had come to terms of agreement through the terms of Commerce, Gerbil?

-Do you no longer wish to engage on the Terms of Commerce?

>>12520319

>ARE YOU SO FUCKING BLIND BARKEEP YOU CANT SEE TH DIFFERENCE OF THEM HIDING INFORMATION FROM ANONS???

kek "anon"

-no, I just entertained your act of contrition, when you agreed to stop fighting over the kitchen and your content in the Dough

-I had agreed to notable your content when in fact it was notable

(and it HAS made it into the notables, and even the globals since then)

But, JUST LIKE I TOLD ANONS, you are unable to work constructively with anons

-you will NOT honor the terms of commerce in any exchange you engage in

-this leave us with the TERMS OF WAR

as anons have witnessed today, you will consistently use war-like tactics against this board in order to get "what you want"

-thank you for displaying again, for the hundreth time, your true colors

o7

>>12520465

>You can't make a deal with the enemy, Barkeep. They have no honor

absolutely agree

I attempted to make this argument to anons, but sometimes it is best to SHOW them

>>12520530

>And I remember that EVERY SINGLE TIME you show up to defend JonDoodle. Weird how that happens.

I defend a lot of people OSS

I have defended THE FUCK out of you

I have defended AnimeBaker

I have defended anons

and YES

I have defended JonDoodle

I am not ashamed of it

and I am not denying it

What is your POINT?

>>12520578

>Barkeep shows up and takes the bread from "JonDoodle"

>Next morning wash, rinse, repeat.

what the fuck do you want me to do OSS?

-be fucking specific

>>12520606

>And I never need you to defend me, my track record, contributions and history speaks for itself.

NOT THE FUCKING POINT AT ALL

YOU ARE ATTEMPTING TO IMPUGNE MY CHARECTOR BECAUSE I DEFEND JONDOODLE

-as if I am on THAT TEAM or some shit

I am making the point that I will come to the defense of ANYONE I think deserves it

My point stands

I dont give a FLYING FUCK if you think you need defending

>>12520644

>Stop defending the dayshift cancer that is the JonDoodle/Gerbil good cop/bad cop play that /MNR/ is running with their static vpn. Pretty fucking simple.

Thank you for stating your position so I dont have to try and decipher it from your sideways accusation

TO BE CLEAR:

I have FREE WILL, and can DEFEND ANYONE I CHOOSE

Officially, FUCK YOU

>>12520644

>Stop defending the dayshift cancer that is the JonDoodle/Gerbil

Can you please explain to me how my comments to GERBIL in this bread constitute a defense of JonDoodle?

Please, explain to me how my comments in this bread are a DEFENSE of JonDoodle

I will wait.

>>12520681

>You defend JonDoodle out of one side of your mouth and then admit there is no way JonDoodle is one person out of the other.

where am I defending JonDoodle in this thread?

→ >>12520688

>>12520681

>Also, very strange how you and doc have the same affinity for memes.

So now you are going to accuse ME of being part of /comms/ and /mnr/ ?

GOOD FUCKING TIMES

Fuck you man

you are NOT helping this board

>>12520681

>BV, just this bread, confirmed team faggot. All your persona belongs to us.

ID Check:

https://pastebin.com/GM95cx6a

https://pastebin.com/GM95cx6a

https://pastebin.com/GM95cx6a

https://pastebin.com/GM95cx6a

https://pastebin.com/GM95cx6a

>>12520738

>Gerbil pisses anons off enough to allow Doodle to bake 20 hours a day and delete shit.

did I defend Gerbil?

>>12520773

>You work with Barkeep because Barkeep is doc

Thank you for just coming out and straight accusing me of being Doc

I am PERFECTLY OKAY with letting anons make up their own mind on that one OSS

not even going to ATTEMPT to defend it

>>12520786

>Did you defend Doodle and try to say it is totally plausible for 1 person to bake 130 hours a week?

No, I have not -SINCE out LAST conversation- about it where I agreed that was bullshit, and obviously more than one person

>>12520813

>Now play the victim.

I am not claiming to be a victim

I am accusing you of being a faggot

simple as