<Outside Nancy Pelosi's room

Chanting "Break it down, break it down"

Glass being broken

Screams

"Yo, there's a gun! There's a gun! There's a gun!"

Echo'd confirmation of gun among the group

Ashli Babbitt was lifted into a freshly broken window; "Lifter(s)" start leaving.

Shot fired

Infiltrators lifted Ashli into LOS of a known gun.

They walked and 'cheered' beside other Patriots; Blended in.

In a known Information War, why are the infiltrators often omitted?

Rhetorical tbh~

These people are sick.

TL;DR of AJ interview with Robert Barnes.

The narrative of the infiltrators [AI, virtual reality, secret MAGA patriot messages, cult] replaced the content of Q.

The expected confusion of those assaulted in an Information War is taken as the epitome of insights we have to offer.

Curiously, this is exactly what happened at the capital hill 'riot'.

It's naive to omit the actions of our enemy, and insidious to blame what they do on the very target they're hitting.

That's the framework, isn't it?

On one hand their public belief is that Q itself is the poisonous message.

On the other, Q is the message many want to poison.

In both frameworks, we're in an Information War, which posits the presence of 'infiltrators whom push a narrative' as a tactical fact.

We have an OSINT geolocate proving Q has access to the Presidents phone while on board AF1 in real time, that trumps the credentials of any AJ brownnoser's 'word'.

Is that a simulation?

Simulations are shattered with real world events, no?

That happened.

You deny it?

Then you know the implications of this.

Exactly who's living in a 'simulation'?

Neither of us. You know well what's at stake.

So what's the approach Journalists on the 'platform of the highest caliber' use?

Did they separate out the obvious poison thrown on us, or did they see us through the lens of their own pushed narrative.

They smiled as they lied to your face

"We are all Alex Jones now"

No sweetie, we have Souls, you jelly wannabean~

Our Best Days Have Yet To Come

EAM LOYALISTS:

''RED1: POTUS twitter removal''

''RED2: Central communications blackout [continental US]''

RED3: CLAS movement PELOSI or PENCE

RED4: Movement of MIL assets [10th Mountain_1st Marine_CPSD_Marine_QVIR] to central locations under guise of citizen riot control.

RED5: NAT MIL COM CEN

RED6: SEC OF DEF _instruct1

USSS

CASTLE_ROCK

Q 04-Jun-2020

Chatter uptick re: how to effectively prevent cross-talk re: anti-narrative across all social media/online platforms.

Ability to prevent cross-talk narrows comms only to FAKE NEWS which provides for more control over what is released to inform the public.

A series of scenarios is currently being conducted ['game the sys'] to test response, risk, and calc results.

'Censorship' [added] layers of inserted code 'through keyword targeting' in bio, history, and comments + indiv platform mods has failed to curtail the problem.

'China-Russia-Iran' 'fake' take-down hacks of select platforms (for maintenance) is one scenario being game-played.

[Zero-Day]

Countermeasures in place.

[Example]

''Think Emergency Alert System.''

''Think WH controlled new RT 'news' website''

''Think WH controlled new video stream platform''

Think Here.

Should this occur, immediate steps will be taken to classify each as 'Public Utility' (essential public services) to gain appropriate gov regulation (control).

Why do we make things public?

Q 18-Feb-2019

>T: = To:?

T: B, F, J, 1,5,11-20, ^

Conf_d-ww_CON_off[dark]

_Conf_SIL-_EX

''COMM_Castle_Active_7ZbV-WT9''

''RED1_RED2_''

SAT_40k_se_c_[30m]

Godspeed.

P_pers: WRWY 25-Nov-2017

''COMM_Castle_Active''

Dear qresearch/midnightriders team,

Trust is what enables us to look at each other without running away screaming.

If we're in a relationship with you and we trust you then we make certain assumptions about the past

and we make certain assumptions about the present

and we make certain assumptions about the future..

And everything is stable, so we're standing on solid ground, and the chaos - it's like we're standing on thin ice - the chaos is hidden;

The shark beneath the waves isn't there, we're safe, we're in the lifeboat.

But then if you betray us, like if we're in an intimate relationship and you have an affair and we found out about it then, then we think

one moment we're one place, where everything is secure because we predicated our perception of the world on the axiom of trust and the next second, really the next second, we're in a completely different place

and not only is that place different right now

the place we were years ago is different

and the place we're gunna' be in the future years hence is different and so all of that certainty, that strange certainty that we inhabit can collapse into incredible complexity.

So if you betray us..

Who were you… because you weren't who we thought you were, and we thought we knew you but we didn't know you at all, and we never knew you, and so all the things we did together those weren't the things we thought were happening - something else was happening.

You're someone else.

That means we're someone else because we thought we knew what was going on and clearly we don't and we're some sorts of blind suckers or or the victims of psychopaths or we're so naive that we can barely live. We don't understand anything about human beings and we don't understand anything about ourselves and we have no idea where we are now.

We thought we were at home but we're not we're in a house and it's full of strangers and we don't know what we'll do tomorrow or next week or next year it's like that certainty that habitable certainty collapses right back into the potential from which it emerged and that's a terrifying thing.

Clean our ship.

Sincerely,

The voice reading this~

Do (You) believe this demoralizing push?

I don't ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[Pics] Contextually relevant to Pompeo's theme today.

Iran's taking heat, it shows in their posts here~