Anonymous ID: c3df53 Jan. 14, 2021, 12:45 p.m. No.12520166   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0202 >>0260 >>0296 >>0306 >>0348 >>0601

https://www.foxnews.com/media/washington-post-melania-trump-coded-messages

+pic related:

Don't believe everything you read. -Q

 

My fellow anons, could I please get at least one n*table or at least a (you)? I personally all by myself discovered THIS Q PROOF seemingly encoded Melania tweet and, just today, said article. Maybe just for once, in this one instance, the Fake News isn't quite so fake? I would just appreciate your acknowledgement is all. Here since beginning. Still trusting the plan. WWG1WGA! Thank you.

Anonymous ID: c3df53 Jan. 14, 2021, 1:02 p.m. No.12520478   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0547

>>12520322

This is true. And checked. But isn't there personal satisfaction in knowing you're behind something other anonymous people like yourself have found relevant? What's wrong with that?

Anonymous ID: c3df53 Jan. 14, 2021, 1:13 p.m. No.12520624   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12520547

It's just that, I've posted my findings without as much context as I provided this time, before and literally nobody noticed or cared. That's rough because I really think Melania's tweet constitutes an excellent Q proof. I mean this is an official word search created by the WH & hosted on their government website, shared by the FLOTUS for children - what are the odds it has any hidden references at all, let alone numerous references all @Q, the so-called 'baseless' conspiracy theory claiming direct ties to POTUS? What are the odds 'SEND' occurs twice in a row, diagonally, across two different sides of the puzzle & in attachment to other words, words which happen to reflect what Q OP 'does' for we, the people?