>>12526993

This all depends on the orders. If it's Title 10 then it is Federal active duty under federal control. If it's Title 32, then they are still considered under state control, and there is also another type of activation called State Active Duty when they are called to active duty by their governor in support of their state only within their state, which only counts as working for the state, not any type of real active duty military service.

Source: Former Army Reservist and National Guardsman. Me.

>>12527078

Forgot to mention, when I did support for Hurricane Katrina and other security missions, most of the time we were "deputized" by local sheriffs to have civilian police power as a way around the posse comitatus act. We were technically military officers, but also deputized as civilian sheriffs for local law enforcement. Most of the time if we had to detain somebody, we woudl detain and hand over directly to local law enforcement.

>>12527112

Could be Title 32 under orders to be attached to DC National Guard, which is when they are "borrowed" but still under national guard control, not US Army Federal control. But your point about DC is a special case where the NG is controlled by POTUS.