>It would be completely illegal to show the public that evidence.
Not if the law (that possession of evidence is a crime) is found to be unconstitutional.
>It is and will be ILLEGAL to show the public CHILD PORN to prove child abuse. Fucking pedo panting hoping to fap to the evidence?
No. Not at all.
Patriot who wants consistency in the law.
The only evidence it is illegal to possess, is evidence of crimes of the elite.
This is not constitutional, and let's discuss the logic and not cast aspersions at my motives!
Nothing wrong with my mind, it's yours that's broken.
Under what logical system of laws does "evidence against elites" get the only "you can't own that" designation?
Talk about the logic, don't cast your own aspersions at me.