>>12531848 older bread
Interdasting phenom, actually, were the MSM transmit the truth even as they attempt to discredit the movement. The people can see through it enough that the noise gets dampened and, with local person-to-person acknowledgements, the signal of strengthened.
MSM undoing itself.
RED
Think game theory and the stereotype of win-win compromise – especially when confronted by overwhelming odds and surrender is the common/expected practice, or when conceding is generally assumed to be the 'right thing' to do for the sake of self-interest.
Well if you do not comform to the win-win myth you might choose instead to DEFY.
What is a RED flag raised by the underdog, or percieved loser, when the outcome is thought no longer in doubt and the process just needs to play out.
Red flag of DEFIANCE.
But think mirror. When would the RED FLAG be raised by the presumed powerhouse who has the upperhand and is read to destroy the weakened adversary. A different kind of defiance. In such a circumstance the common practice might be to offer a way out, surrender for example, major concessions for example, treasure for example, sacrificed individuals for example. And so putting aside those common practices foregoing the option to accept surrender or some sort of apparent win-win based on self-interest would be defiance of the 'norm' or the expected.
Flying the RED FLAG of defiance can mean signalling that no surrender will be accepted. A crushing defeat regardless of the potential for surrender.
It can also mean NO DEALS. Fight to the death. No way out.
Now, rethink the surrounding of the CAPITOL with fencing and such and ringed with armed 'protectors'. When a sanctuary becomes a prison, there is no surrender, no deals, no win-win pretense.
EXPECT the symbolism of a RED FLAG to include the gestures of defiance, such as waving a red shirt or the 'seeing red' and the 'caught red handed' all being at play in how people signal to each other their condition and their intentions.
In the Middle Ages, ships in combat flew a long red streamer, called the Baucans, to signify a fight to the death.[3] In one petition, a group of English sailors asserted that the Crown had no right to a share of the prize money earned from a Norman ship captured in 1293 because it had raised the Baucans.[4] (Raising this streamer may have been a relatively novel practice at this time, since the writers feel the need to explain it.) By the 17th century, the Baucans had evolved into a red flag, or "flag of defiance."[5] It was raised in cities and castles under siege to indicate that they would not surrender.[6] "The red flag is a signal of defiance and battle," according to Chambers Cyclopedia (1727–41).[7]
read their own version
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_flag_(politics)
Come and Take It.
Also, fren.
The battles are not neverending but instead but come down to NOW – win all or lose all. It eventually leads to the realization that it is not a good move to negotiate by offering to split the difference.
Way past such a notion now, as per peach mint repeat - with no hearings. Political opposition now 'domestic terrorists'. And the rest.
Eventually negotiation becomes renwed basis for comity, of course, and by then we negotiate as if our lives depended on it. Lessons learned force re-legitimization of law and order via rule of law. Peace is won by the blood of Patriots one way or another.
Q 1511
Search foreign posts (State).
Face important.
Q
https://qanon.pub/index2.html?q=face%20#1511