Aposematism. Warning coloration. It's real, folks.
And we'll be right here for when you get back, angryanon.
After the past 4 years, it's just words, anon. Who's that person that Q says to trust, again?
And now we know why Q made the distinction in this drop:
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: f457dc No.11118631 📁
Oct 17 2020 11:36:26 (EST)
https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746📁
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q
Grassley doing what needed to be done to keep everything on the right timeline.
No. Not at all. Housley is at that stage where he needs to reconcile if "Q" is 100% authentic or not, or just wait until absolute confirmation later and join the bandwagon. It's one of those "career self-preservation" moves.