Anonymous ID: 7ab383 Jan. 15, 2021, 3:24 p.m. No.12539835   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

the slime team that banters their punch-n-tucky rodeo clown bash-oh-roe has changed tactics. Instead of gerbit-banter and OSo S loppy discord we get the new one: we are so smart that we will . . .and rebrand the name, like you are our product.

 

but it's just the same script that they use: constant discord. Constant 'no, sir, I say so' and 'unt ahhh'

 

It's difficult to not play along by trying to argue against it. It is hard to not tell them they are full of shit.

but the urge to say 'no' to their narrative does compell us. and given how totally wrong they are, we must forgive those who say 'Oh, no, you're not pulling this shit again'

Anonymous ID: 7ab383 Jan. 15, 2021, 3:47 p.m. No.12540158   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12540117

if I'd asked I could have had a medal sent for participating in the end of Communism and winning the cold war, but it didn't really feel over and I thought 'oh, come on.'

but if . . . I were to get one of these I'd be like 'this is really cool.'

Anonymous ID: 7ab383 Jan. 15, 2021, 3:54 p.m. No.12540270   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

This being Martin Luthor King Jr.'s birthday, may I suggest that it would be a good idea, after all the stuff in DC resolves, for people to consider a more modest statue of the great man? One that shows him in a more typical mood? and puts him at ground level and doesn't make him a mock of an ancient statue to a a person whose family thought too highly of him?

or who thought too highly of himself?

and we can gift the one that's there to go on a world tour.

Anonymous ID: 7ab383 Jan. 15, 2021, 3:57 p.m. No.12540314   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12540272

you continue with your nonsense.

this was the last free speech place.

people here heard about that old soviet effort.

it was known it would be used against us.

So we haunted here and said 'we'll not let them get away with it this time' and told them everytime that they would start up with the mind fudge 'Not this time.'

so fail for that.

Anonymous ID: 7ab383 Jan. 15, 2021, 4:13 p.m. No.12540535   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

so, shills, you really get it now that you are fucked, right? just asking.

I know a consensus is impossible here. but won't won of you just break character and admit it: you're on the wrong side of this.

or say 'we are only here to see if any of you are baddies, but I don't see any.' not to put words in your mouth.

but when did you first realize that anon are righteous and you are on the wrong side of history?