>>12540999 lb

>>12541087 lb

See.

We were warned about that so

it's not necessarily scary.

I put the "not knowing/not

expecting it to happen" in the

[SCARE] category.

So, something along those lines.

>>12541095 lb

Guess it could be taken that way

with all the questions that I'm not

relaxed.

I am.

Just a curiouswannaknoweverythingfaganon.

>>12541096 lb

Yup.

That great unknown.

Known to get lots of people antsy.

>>12541146 lb

That's definitely popcorn material.

>>12541157 lb

Wow.

I'm contradicting myself here now

but, that would be pretty scary.

Yes, we were warned about it and

so we know about it but it's the

not knowing what that weather

event could actually be and that

it affects the whole planet?

Yeah.

Scary.

Good dig/find, anon.

o7

>>12541193 lb

kek

That's a very optimistic perspective

to take!

Yous is a gameranon, arentcha?

kek

But, yeah, I think I could probably

embrace a little of that, too.

Thanks, anon.

>>12541308 lb

Now, if this was what Byrne posted

with the caption

"Is this an inauguration or something else?"

There wouldn't be an issue.

There also wouldn't be as huge of an

effect or impact.

Two osprey fly-acrosses pale in

comparison to 8 military helis followed by

three osprey fly-overs.

Just talking optics here.

Completely different vibe.

Regardless.

Vid posted by Richard Citizen Journalist

WAS, in fact, DC whereas Patrick Byrne's

WAS NOT.

Which was the point being made.

>>12541685

That's riiiight!

I can only imagine what that could be.

Though, the conversion, conjunction (?) was pretty awesome.

>>12541910

In one sense, yes.

But, in Byrne's case, it was more of

an inflammatory, potential to incite

type of a post because of the

"strength" (?) the image of that

many military aircraft flying over

DC, supposedly, conveyed.

Gotta stick to maintaining crediblity.

Especially, when he's got all this

super juicy stuff that he's been

spilling.

It puts a filter of doubt over everything

else he does after that point when there

was no need to.

He could have just as easily used

RCJ's clip, if it was merely to point out

level of Marine presence.

But his choice of a FRAUDULENT

vid, when his whole sudden back to the

limelight issue was addressing the

FRAUD in the election, looks hypocritical,

suspect and untrustworthy.

And comes across as just clibckbait.