>>12539799 (pb)

Being totally serious here. Once all the corrupt people are removed from power, who will be left to keep the government going?

Does anyone else think they could do better than the current agencies? Maybe Mike Lindell is the only major business owner in the country who Trump could trust for legit suggestions for the next administration.

I would like to personally replace the FDA. I would like an adequate salary of $40k (per YEAR, I am not Hunter Biden) and a pad of red ink with a stamp pad. My job would be to stamp "NO" across all the dumb and evil ideas submitted for new and bizarre ways to poison Americans.

>>12541416

For the longest time I have thought that social media platforms should charge some minimal amount for their service. Say 5 cents per hour or so. Maybe you could "earn" time by providing content that generated more views.

However, social media platforms decided "we" were the "product" not the "consumer" and they charged most of us NOTHING in exchange for getting access to our data. They did not realize that we were people capable of independent thought and so we did unexpected things with our social media besides just posting puppies and kitties and random gossip, etc. We discussed REAL things. Until the point that we grew too big for them. Our content FILLED the platforms tearing at the artificial and manipulated reality they wanted us to fall for. Finally, like the children of Israel leaving Egypt we became loathsome to our slavemasters, to people like @Jack who cannot make his platform work without us nor can he continue with us.