>>1254864
>To replace him with a new puppet, because he took his money out of Rockefeller's bank.
That's just a claim, nothing more. I can claim the opposite.
>And then CIA Bush bombed Iran's enemy in the region, Iraq.
That's actually the first argument that sort of makes sense. Though it's just as likely that the cabal wanted both Iraq and Iran gone (which they tricked into fighting each other before). Middle Eastern chaos is also good for MIC business.
>>1254732
>not able to recognize a puppet state even after NK, also lacking Roth/IMF bank, was just fucking dealt with.
>attention spans of gnats up in here
So how do you know that NK is a cabal puppet? Just because somebody claimed so? Someone as gullible as that should stick to watching CNN.