Anonymous ID: f67121 Jan. 16, 2021, 5:42 a.m. No.12548372   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12548337

I have no idea what the guy thinks. I can just see from his behavior that he believes his own story.

It's based on a narrative that throws this place into the trash, so I don't understand why he goes on with it.

I wonder if he is fed false information because a guy like that, in theory, is supposed to be trustworthy.

so I can't know. I wish him well. If he's gotta face a situation he's unaware of? someone could tell him. But due to the fact that he has no idea what happened Jan 6, and he was supposedly there in the building, and then he voted to impeach, saying it was 'OK' to not have a trial . . .

He's either got differentn news or he's willfully false.

I want to think of him as 'good' but I still keep seeing him as controlled. like he doesn't provide his own copy.

Anonymous ID: f67121 Jan. 16, 2021, 6:02 a.m. No.12548593   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8621 >>8623 >>8638 >>8657 >>8658 >>8766

with all the posts attacking my other post people scrolling through are going to pause for a second and wonder 'did Q post this?' and see , no, jsut an anon.

 

again 'using the term 'faggots' makes it harder to get readers for your content.

 

it's true. So what did I say that was wrong?

nothing.

 

and I triggered you all so hard.

I didn't mean to.

I was thinking abou the four children of the Rothdude who died.

Anonymous ID: f67121 Jan. 16, 2021, 6:03 a.m. No.12548610   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12548596

 

it's really the other way around.

I understand what it is and comment on it.

others attack me because they are what you said.

 

my statement was correct.

Anonymous ID: f67121 Jan. 16, 2021, 6:06 a.m. No.12548637   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8656

>>12548621

I'm half sleeping. I post truthful things mostly. Other times playful.

so what part of 'using the term 'faggots' makes it harder for other to take your content seriously and less likely they will read your post' is untrue?