>>12551170 (lb)
Having faith in the plan is pretty simple once you get through a few proofs that are "good enough for you". Maintaining the discipline to remain faithful is actually pretty simple as well; it takes just a few minutes to ponder. Comes down to two choices:
-
If the plan is utter bullshit, we're all fucked. Completely.
-
If the plan is real, and we're about to witness traitors getting perp walked, life's going to change for the better, and we'll be in rarely charted waters for a while as the public slowly becomes "Q" acolytes while dealing with the cognitive dissonance of having believed MSM lies without fail for the past few years.
Watch those that are falling off the bandwagon. They are either somewhat compromised, or were never really part of the movement. People wavering back and forth are trying to surf the public momentum to stay relevant. In the end, the only viewpoint that matters is your own.
>>12551341 (lb)
If you fail to understand why adding some names to the list shouldn't be a problem for "list" anon, I don't know what to tell you. I know for a fact that letting someone else tell you what to think is usually a bad idea. So when someone is telling you what to think by who to follow, and they reject names suggested to add to the list of people recommended to help "tell you what to think", then they are being intellectually dishonest by doing so.
Capice?