Anonymous ID: eb65d6 Jan. 16, 2021, 4:30 p.m. No.12556923   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6959

>>12556868

ha! what we say here doesn't change it.

no one here knows these "qanon leaders" they use in the media, for instance. doesn't slow them down…

but when Q's active they have to be more reactive in their spin, in moments of calm they have freer reign

Anonymous ID: eb65d6 Jan. 16, 2021, 4:33 p.m. No.12556972   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>12556941

>have any jurisdiction in regards to such matters.

argh, that's what infuriates me so with normies' disregard for "conspiracy theories"…

ok, fine, laugh if you will, but can we have adults in the room to make sure it's still just a laughing matter once in a while? fuck's sake

Anonymous ID: eb65d6 Jan. 16, 2021, 4:52 p.m. No.12557278   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>12557237

> possible conclusion.

i'm thinking, having it be so ambiguous to the end might well have been crucial as to reassure those who keep track of this place with bad intent… just as we see it looking bad but think there's gotta be a twist, on their side they're told that of course he's a stooge for those in control and everything will soon go back to normal…

 

<how do you capture… ?